OJL emphasizes doing rather than watching and listening. Here are a few of the most effective techniques. OJL has several major benefits compared to traditional study. Which do you think would get you better results? You could either plow through a 2‑inch thick textbook on giving the perfect presentation or practice presenting for real. OJL is generally more relevant than traditional study whenever the skill to be learned is more practical than theoretical in nature.This is a prime example of a situation where OJL would provide the most effective solution – that being, getting staff used to the new technology as quickly as possible. A company or department wants to introduce new software that interfaces with its existing IT systems.In many situations, OJL has major benefits over traditional study. The main aim is to enable people to make as much progress as possible, as quickly as possible. OJL involves making learning processes part of the working experience – using the devices, documents, tools, and materials your staff are already using on a day‑to‑day basis. On‑the‑job learning – as its name suggests – simply entails training and learning in the workplace while you’re working instead of taking time out to head off to a stuffy conference room and gawk at cookie‑cutter PowerPoint presentations. And with good reason! OJL – as opposed to traditional study – provides the flexibility and adaptability to capitalize quickly and effectively on new developments and technological innovations.īut what does OJL actually involve in practice? What are the pros and cons of this way of learning? And what tools and techniques can you use to implement OJL within your organization or take it to the next level? On‑the‑job training or on‑the‑job learning (OJL) is becoming increasingly popular and even usurping traditional training courses and workshops within many organizations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |